Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:21 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS
>
> I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think it
> needs much more work before it could be uploaded (let alone my objections
> against introducing MooseFS to Debian). There are too many issues to list...
Could you enlight me? 'debian' folder looks almost the same in MooseFS and LizardFS. What issues are you talking about? Some examples?
Believe me or not, but we are very open to change some things in MooseFS. As you maybe know we change licence of open source version to GPL and made it freely available, so we always try to adapt to community necessities.
>
> --
> All the best,
> Dmitry Smirnov.
>
> ---
>
> However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the
> results.
> -- Winston Churchill
--
Pozdrawiam,
Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Tel. +48 602 212 039
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Bug#811214: RFS: retroarch/1.3.0-1 [ITP]
- Next by Date:
Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
- Previous by thread:
Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
- Next by thread:
Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system
- Index(es):