Hi Graham, On 19-01-14 16:41, Graham Inggs wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my update to package "doublecmd": By source and binary inspection: - Some (if not all, I am unsure) of your Conflicts are unneeded, Breaks is good enough. Please read [1] and following paragraphs carefully again. - In line with the previous comment, your debugging packages might be missing Breaks/Replaces on each other, they can't be both installed at the same time. But it is possible that that is handled properly via their Provides. Did you actually test this? - Why are there still plugins in the doublecmd-(gtk|qt) packages? - Did you deliberately put some documentation in /usr/share/doublecmd/doc? I think it is more appropriate in /usr/share/doc/ - Am I mistaken, or are the debian/*.dir files not doing anything useful? Paul [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-breaks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature