Re: Coding style question: Are self-fulfilling headers desired? Are u32/u64 or uint32_t/uint64_t preferred?

To: nbd@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: Coding style question: Are self-fulfilling headers desired? Are u32/u64 or uint32_t/uint64_t preferred?
From: Lars Rohwedder <roker@pep-project.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:46:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 6d12f907-978a-423a-8816-e024ad147e73@pep-project.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ee0bb37f-9820-41d6-8303-9bcecad4f39e@pep-project.org>
References: <[🔎] ee0bb37f-9820-41d6-8303-9bcecad4f39e@pep-project.org>

You might have a look to the changes I made on my own fork:

https://github.com/RokerHRO/nbd/commit/33a32e3ebf56fe0b981c8cb29d4723abd424f448

L.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Coding style question: Are self-fulfilling headers desired? Are u32/u64 or uint32_t/uint64_t preferred?
  - From: Lars Rohwedder <roker@pep-project.org>