Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:13:46 +0200 with message-id <49046D0A.4040204@gmail.com> and subject line closing #236146 has caused the Debian Bug report #236146, regarding apt: requires that deps are explicitely specified to get installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 236146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=236146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: apt: requires that deps are explicitely specified to get installed
- From: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:51:40 +0100
- Message-id: <20040304145139.GA20733@bylbo.nowhere.earth>
Package: apt Version: 0.5.23 Severity: normal At last I see this problem on sid, and with a quite simple test case - but I've seen that on woody with many sources and a complex setup as well. # apt-get install libosmesa4-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libosmesa4-dev: Depends: mesag-dev (= 5.0.0-5.1) E: Broken packages And then: # apt-get install libosmesa4-dev mesag-dev [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: mesag-dev: Depends: mesa-common-dev (= 5.0.0-5.1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages # apt-get install libosmesa4-dev mesag-dev mesa-common-dev [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: mesa-common-dev: Depends: libglu1-mesa-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages # apt-get install libosmesa4-dev mesag-dev mesa-common-dev mesa-common-dev [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: mesa-common-dev: Depends: libglu1-mesa-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages # apt-get install libosmesa4-dev mesag-dev mesa-common-dev mesa-common-dev libglu1-mesa-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libglu1-mesa libosmesa4 mesag3 The following packages will be REMOVED: xlibmesa-dev xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibmesa3-gl xlibmesa3-glu-dbg xlibosmesa-dev xlibosmesa3 The following NEW packages will be installed: libglu1-mesa libglu1-mesa-dev libosmesa4 libosmesa4-dev mesa-common-dev mesag-dev mesag3 0 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 8 to remove and 7 not upgraded. Need to get 2219kB of archives. After unpacking 16.0MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] And "apt-cache policy" does show that for all those packages the candidate version is the one in sid: # apt-cache policy libosmesa4-dev mesag-dev mesa-common-dev mesa-common-dev libglu1-mesa-dev | grep Candidate Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 All of them look like the following, except for those existing in stable: libosmesa4-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: 5.0.0-5.1 Version Table: 5.0.0-5.1 0 500 http://aptproxy unstable/main Packages 5.0.0-5 0 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org sarge/main Packages Do you need my status file or something like that ? -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-k6+preempt+acl Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=français Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-1 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ? Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux: Pro: <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 236146-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing #236146
- From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:13:46 +0200
- Message-id: <49046D0A.4040204@gmail.com>
Version: 0.6.0 As no other bugs are merged with this, and I see no similar reports after 7 May 2004 (last date in this thread) I assume that bug had gone long time ago. Marked as fixed in the next major apt version than reported (0.5.23) - 0.6.0. Reopen if you object. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---