Bug#982892: ITP: binutils-or1k-elf -- GNU binary utilities for the Open RISC 1000 processors
> > [binutils-or1k-elf] build-depends on gcc-10-source.
> Do you mean binutils-source here?
Of course.
Copy/paste error from the similar ITP bug for gcc-ork1k-elf.
> > * Package name : binutils-or1k-elf
> I am wondering whether it is a good idea to package this separately from
> binutils. Even though you don't run Linux on the or1k, there is a Debian
> architecture for it (as you could do that). The or1k support in binutils
> is mainlined, so I think it would be quite simple to enable or1k support
> in the main binutils source package. It's a very simple change there.
The maintainers of the 'binutils' .dsc package deliberately support a
limited set of targets. Outside this set, separate .dsc packages are
recommended (even without patches) so that an issue affecting an
architecture does not block all other ones.
Reply to: