[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969586: marked as done (O: iwd -- wireless daemon for Linux)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:57:47 +0200
with message-id <160215106733.3150661.17671710817077717440@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: O: iwd -- wireless daemon for Linux
has caused the Debian Bug report #969586,
regarding O: iwd -- wireless daemon for Linux
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
969586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969586
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the iwd package in the next upload.

The package description is:
 Minimalistic wireless daemon that uses modern Linux interfaces like
 cfg80211 and nl80211 (netlink). The daemon provides a D-Bus API.
 .
 The daemon can be controlled from the command line with the included
 iwctl client utility.
 .
 The included iwmon utility can be used to monitor the 802.11 subsystem
 generic netlink commands and events. It uses the nlmon kernel driver
 from Linux 3.10 and later.

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.9-2

I took over maintenance of iwd since release 1.9-2, closing this bug.

Thanks to Andreas Henriksson for past efforts,
and to Matteo F. Vescovi for reminding of this bug closure.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: