[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#573859: marked as done (RFP: libdbxml -- Berkeley DB XML library)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:20:04 +0000
with message-id <E1cyFNc-00085u-Qu@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libdbxml -- Berkeley DB XML library
has caused the Debian Bug report #573859,
regarding RFP: libdbxml -- Berkeley DB XML library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

URL: http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-db/xml/index.html
License: BSD-style and Apache 1.1
( http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/htdocs/xmloslicense.html )

Berkeley DB XML is an embedded XML database system based upon Berkeley DB.

XML databases offer a middle ground between the basic key-value databases
and the rigidity of relational databases.

This implementation comes as a simple library and can handle a database in a
single plain file or a few files in a directory. There is no need for a
database server, user management, etc.

There are, AFAIK, no libraries with remotely similar features currently in
Debian.

The bundle has bindings for various languages, including Perl, Python, PHP
and Java. The Perl binding, at least, builds and works well.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 573859 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: