Bug#114336: ITP: xpostit-i18n -- simple postit program on X with I18N support
Hi :)
In <[🔎] 20011003183201.A4410@ysabell.wh.vaih>,
on "Wed, 3 Oct 2001 18:32:01 +0200",
with "Re: Bug#114336: ITP: xpostit-i18n -- simple postit program on X with I18N support",
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> wrote:
> >> Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org> writes:
>
> > The i18n patch was distributed on a newsgroup (fj.sources).
> > The original source archive was distributed from several
> > ftp servers such as sun site.
>
> A small nitpick... *must* it be called xpostit-i18n? Why isn't xpostit
> good enough?
I'd thought that adding suffix (-18n) shows that the applied I18N patch
has not been merged into the original upstream of xpostit.
But this may not be necessary.
Do you think just simple "xpostit" better ?
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>
Reply to: