Re: Proposal to overturn init systems premature GR

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Ian Jackson writes ("Proposal to overturn init systems premature GR"):
> Sam has decided to cut short this process.  We started this public
> discussion less than a month ago.  This is very short.

I still think the timeline is too abbreviated but we are where we
are.

> I hereby propose the following General Resolution:

I hereby *conditionally* withdraw this proposal.  If, and only, if, my
recently drafted G+D option is accepted onto the ballot, I withdraw
this proposal.

Please would people who seconded my G+D option also formally second
this procedural GR.  This will make it more likely that G+D will
actually appear on the ballot.

Unfortunately under the circumstances I think the potential G+E is
going to be lost and also Guillem may not have a proper chance to
add text to his G as he wishes to.

Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFUBAEBCAA+FiEEVZrkbC1rbTJl58uh4+M5I0i1DTkFAl3o9eUgHGlqYWNrc29u
QGNoaWFyay5ncmVlbmVuZC5vcmcudWsACgkQ4+M5I0i1DTlBoggApVJTrBAy8g2d
EZKxKnv3err3d+QUwUPXw581SxWDV2U12RvCnVDQaUU/MBZ/8xygYXxiB130/3kJ
baYoh6VdImlzOkMIBxusKJ9vBf02PV/lJpqmN9R06bGtZRrTTl/EqH3QWkLxX/K6
tqwGT2Rd+srXb6sbWpOc8ZRm6ynzdM9kHazZxVHH/com4KWutgWiBo7RNNvzM0yM
BV5njXElceeRHdqnPBIdx+Bt7zcN1GZ9CH7M2aLiah7PoRAXx6CMsnlzBfqTt1yw
4OdW72n4Gi4aueMjTIEZbnh1a0zbEvj1rSeYrKJ6GYH4QmepiBLDJzk7NNBOvuj4
bBs27LRsiw==
=qdKt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----