Re: Firmware & Social Contract: GR proposal
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> As best I can see, our users expect us to release etch soon rather than
> either of the approaches to fixing that that have been mooted so far
> (drop drivers or delay etch), and I don't believe we can fairly say
> we're putting the needs of our users (or free software) first if we
> don't meet those expectations.
We could have met those expectations of the d-i and kernel teams had
taken the issue seriously before now. Their failure to do so does not
translate to an emergency on my or Debian's part.
Thomas
Reply to: