Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:51:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1153475481.712880.1671.nullmailer@klnet.towers.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 87r70f92w9.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 1153463940.4595.93.camel@dorfl.liw.iki.fi>

Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.iki.fi>
> bad re-interpretations to make it mean something else, like the attempt
> to make only the SPI be able to hold assets for Debian that we've seen
> in recent times, which makes use of an ambiguity in the wording of the
> constitution.)

I agree that the constitution has ambiguities, but can you point to an
older interpretation of the constitution that directs donations to other
organisations?

Thanks,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct

Reply to:

References:
- Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.iki.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Next by Date: Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Previous by thread: Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Next by thread: Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread