Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 08:54:32 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> said:
> On Nov 1, 2003, at 23:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> Whoa there. Some would consider that the editorial changes and
>> dropping section 5 are orthogonal changes, since we can have one,
>> or the other, or both, and neither affects each other.
> I would be one of them, and I think that if someone proposes, and 5
> second, just the editorial changes --- or just the SC 5 dropping ---
> it should be on a separate ballot.
> Indeed, from his comments, I think even the Branden might be happy
> with the two separated, as long as they are on two different
> ballots.
If this is the case, the proposal should be so amended. There
would be no problem running two votes, either in sequence, or
concurrently.
manoj
--
skldfjkljklsR%^&(IXDRTYju187pkasdjbasdfbuil h;asvgy8p
23r1vyui135 2 kmxsij90TYDFS$$b jkzxdjkl bjnk ;j
nk;<[][;-==-<<<<<';[,
[hjioasdvbnuio;buip^&(FTSD$%*VYUI:buio;sdf}[asdf']
sdoihjfh(_YU*G&F^*CTY98y Now look what you've gone and done! You've
broken it!
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>