Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
From: Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:16:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] sm0jzoq2k3i.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
References: <[🔎] trinity-8d74bd05-7d1e-4d6b-ae64-d17235c60cb8-1704303384554@3c-app-mailcom-bs11>

Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> writes:

> Unfortunately, the current package wpasupplicant is unable to do WPA3-Personal authentication.

Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
support. Even the package description says that.

> What alternatives to it exist?

I don't think there are any. Or maybe you could do WPA2-enterprise
instead like I do but it's a little involved.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
  - From: Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com>

References:
- The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
  - From: Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Possibly broken Grub or initrd after updates on Testing
Next by Date: Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10
Previous by thread: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Next by thread: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread