Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:34:04 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] ZHyg3PzZFd7O82Ol@wooledge.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <ZHygFrcCe/1MjBBC@tuxteam.de>
References: <[🔎] CAJmb-YmkFN0ZyNjpuMC5ogJBcy+kNEoCuy7K=4z2G+6GRLEPLA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 5ae291f0-e952-e6b5-fbf5-e0cf95c71146@busby.net> <[🔎] CAJmb-YkxENiQ1QUGE9voi3ZVzLC9WRPipzv_EksOwRYjfYOq+A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 647B188D.2030300@fastmail.fm> <[🔎] u5f7j2$lvr$1@ciao.gmane.io> <[🔎] 647B25FC.4060003@fastmail.fm> <[🔎] u5hb57$14vi$1@ciao.gmane.io> <[🔎] 58a49bff-eb0b-a4e3-6904-f194358ef03f@busby.net> <[🔎] 3119d528-38da-b39b-b021-5567efe65446@kalinowski.com.br> <ZHygFrcCe/1MjBBC@tuxteam.de>

On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 04:30:46PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> So the practice is that the whole internet dumps the whole framework
> schtack [2] on you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAssembly

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>

References:
- Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?
  - From: Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com>
- Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
- Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?
  - From: Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com>
- Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
  - From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
Next by Date: Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
Previous by thread: Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
Next by thread: Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread