Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
- From: soyeomul@doraji.xyz (황병희)
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:00:08 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] yw150bxfOZoVM4YUjh2CmNqvP9Xs6cSnR-k5tFyKE0GdTD__fsf@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20200731092821.GA676@tuxteam.de> (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:28:21 +0200")
- References: <CAFakBwgTFJZpvpyHPVGLtR6Wpjd71BBp-PPTBTMkH=zZjp-s3g@mail.gmail.com> <20200730123353.0973a7a1@earth.stargate.org.uk> <sm0ime59ju4.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <20200730155054.44c764dd@earth.stargate.org.uk> <20200730155810.GA23439@tuxteam.de> <20200730171318.6b3012fa@earth.stargate.org.uk> <20200731055522.splzjwcbpvklqkru@acr13.nuvreauspam> <20200731092821.GA676@tuxteam.de>
<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:55:22AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Jo, 30 iul 20, 17:13:18, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:58:10 +0200
>> > <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello tomas@tuxteam.de,
>> >
>> > *PLEASE* fix your sig separator.
>>
>> What difference does it make for a signature like his ("-- t")?
>
> (Thanks, Andrei :-)
>
> And to the OP...
>
> I know, I know. My signature is minimalistic: officially there SHOULD
> be a newline after the space after the dash after the --uh-- dash.
>
> I skip this newline. It's a quirk. I expect a teaspoon or two of
> Postel's Principle [1] applied to me as I grant it to everyone else.
>
> By the way, OP: "WHY DIDN'T YOU CHANGE THE MAIL'S SUBJECT LINE,
> HEIN?"
>
> Phew. Feels better now ;-P
>
> (And please: take this all with a grain of salt).
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] I know... again. There are people who don't really like Postel's
> Principle. I do. I do not want to discuss with you.
>
> -- t
>
My Gnus no problem, cheers up tomas!!!
Sincerely, tomas fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Reply to: