Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)
On 2016-01-02 16:21:11 +0000, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 01 Jan 2016 at 17:22:37 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2016-01-01 12:03:32 +0000, Brian wrote:
> > > On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote:
> > > > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition?
> > > >
> > > > I get:
> > > >
> > > > ls /sys/class/net/
> > > >
> > > > enp1s0 Io wlan0
> > >
> > > Interesting. One interface is renamed; one is not (wlan0).
> >
> > On my laptop (installed from Jessie, then upgraded to unstable),
> > this is the opposite:
> >
> > eth0 lo wlp61s0
> >
> > Quite strange...
>
> Move 70-persistent-net.rules somewhere and do
>
> rmmod -v <driver>
>
> followed by
>
> modprobe -v <driver>
>
> Repeat with 70-persistent-net.rules returned to /etc/udev/rules.d. Any
> changes in 'ls /sys/class/net/'?
Well, I want to keep eth0 on my laptop because I have things
that depend on it. But what I was wondering is why I have
wlp61s0 instead of wlan0, i.e. why a rule for wlan0 hadn't
been added to 70-persistent-net.rules at that time.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: