Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions

To: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
From: Mike Dresser <mdresser_l@router.windsormachine.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:46:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.1003041645270.17732@router.windsormachine.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201003041951.10298.david.goodenough@btconnect.com>
References: <[🔎] 201003041544.10116.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> <[🔎] 201003041951.10298.david.goodenough@btconnect.com>

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, David Goodenough wrote:

hda: Host Protected Area detected.
^Icurrent capacity is 268435455 sectors (137438 MB)
^Inative  capacity is 312581808 sectors (160041 MB)


Is this a PATA drive, and from there, has a jumper on the back for LBA48?

Mike

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
  - From: consul tores <consultores1@gmail.com>

References:
- qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
  - From: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>
- Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
  - From: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>

Prev by Date: Re: unexpected problem with icedove : hundred of storaged mails no longer have a body !
Next by Date: Re: Installing TTF Unicode fonts in Debian
Previous by thread: Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
Next by thread: Re: qtparted and kernel disagree about partitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread