Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
- To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
- From: "Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:03:14 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4A2690B2.7040309@fgm.com>
- In-reply-to: <20090528133836.GA13101@emurlahn.burrows.local>
- References: <49FC2ED1.9070300@l33tmyst.com> <20090502133811.GC2893@turki.gavron.org> <49FF0CEA.8090904@fgm.com> <20090505223044.GE3005@turki.gavron.org> <4A0848A2.4030008@fgm.com> <20090516221105.GA2915@turki.gavron.org> <4A1C131C.1090806@fgm.com> <20090526181132.GA2896@turki.gavron.org> <4A1D610E.5090508@fgm.com> <20090528020859.GC2896@turki.gavron.org> <20090528133836.GA13101@emurlahn.burrows.local>
Title: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> ...: one of my colleagues bought a keyboard with pedals a
> few years ago. As I understand it, the pedals are used for shift
> states and control characters -- I haven't used it myself, but it seems
> like an interesting idea, and it continues the pianistic angle here. :-)
Are you trying to sustain the discussion. :-)
Daniel
--
(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Reply to: