Re: DULs considered harmful
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Adam Funk <a24061@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Saturday 03 July 2004 08:10, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> An article on vnunet reminds me that I was going to post how to get
>> exim4 to go around those plain retarded DULs. I finally got around to
>> it, and here it is.
>
> Here are some more domains for the sample picky-hosts file, if you're
> interested.
Thanks. I'm probably not going to add it to the page for the sake of
brevity, since once you're that far, you should have a good idea what
kind of patterns we're dealing with.
However, I'm not sure wildcards work there. Do they?
> Are you sure about verizon.net? I send a lot of e-mails to a friend
> with that address domain, and I'm still successfully routing them
> directly.
Verizon's rejected my mail (to postmaster, even!) before, claiming DULs
as a reason.
- --
Paul Johnson
<baloo@ursine.ca>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA53BeUzgNqloQMwcRAudtAKDATmImnQuIt0qLmdXuvv0jIndGWACgh6RF
dXYFlEUyZ6BZAZvI2SIQcoo=
=MrGd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: