[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ipsec + Etch



Hallo,

ich versuche gerade ein VPN-Gateway mittels  FreeS/WAN+L2pns+Radius.
Der erste Schritt wäre eine aktive ipsec-Verbindung, jedoch scheitert es schon an dieser. Client ist Windows XP, welcher auch eine Anfrage auf Port 500(UDP)
stellt.
eth0=192.168.0.1 (Netzintern)
eth1=192.168.2.1 (SDSL)

Auszug ipsec.conf:
version 2.0

config setup
       uniqueids=no
       interfaces=ipsec0=eth1
       crlcheckinterval=180
       nat_traversal=yes
       virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/24
# Debug-logging controls: "none" for (almost) none, "all" for lots, control
       klipsdebug=none
       plutodebug="control controlmore"
       plutostderrlog=/var/log/ipsec.log

#Disable Opportunistic Encryption
include /etc/ipsec.d/examples/no_oe.conf

conn %default
       type=tunnel
       left=%any
       leftid=@gw
       leftcert=gwca.pem
       rightrsasigkey=%cert
       authtby=rsasig
       rekey=no
       keyingtries=0
       auto=add

conn client
       pfs=no
       leftprotoport=17/1701
       rightprotoport=17/1701
       right=%any
       rightid=@client
       rightcert=client.pem

Log:
| *received 312 bytes from xxx.xxx.92.95:500 on eth0 (port=500)
|  processing packet with exchange type=ISAKMP_XCHG_IDPROT (2)
packet from xxx.xxx.92.95:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
packet from xxx.xxx.92.95:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION]
packet from xxx.xxx.92.95:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] method set to=106 packet from xxx.xxx.92.95:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact]
| find_host_connection called from main_inI1_outR1
| find_host_pair_conn (find_host_connection2): 181.192.8.1:500 xxx.xxx.92.95:500 -> hp:none
| find_host_connection called from main_inI1_outR1
| find_host_pair_conn (find_host_connection2): 181.192.8.1:500 %any:500 -> hp:none packet from xxx.xxx.92.95:500: initial Main Mode message received on 181.192.8.1:500 but no connection has been authorized
| complete state transition with STF_IGNORE
| next event EVENT_PENDING_PHASE2 in 38 seconds


Hat vielleicht jemand eine Idee, wo etwas falsch ist?

Gruß
Boris


Reply to: