Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:12:35 +0200 with message-id <a8c79e53-5f46-d0a9-96bf-90aece9c3565@web.de> and subject line Re: Bug#865231: texlive-latex-recommended: no longer Provides latex-xcolor, making reverse dependencies uninstallable has caused the Debian Bug report #865231, regarding texlive-latex-recommended: no longer Provides latex-xcolor, making reverse dependencies uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 865231: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865231 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: texlive-latex-recommended: no longer Provides latex-xcolor, making reverse dependencies uninstallable
- From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:57:29 +0200
- Message-id: <878tkncqna.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
Package: texlive-latex-recommended Version: 2017.20170619-1 Severity: serious This version of texlive-latex-recommended has silently (at least there is no mention in the Debian changelog) dropped its Provides from 2016.20170123-5, making two reverse dependencies of latex-xcolor uninstallable: auto-multiple-choice-common and doxygen-latex. Please file bugs on those to update their dependencies and re-add the "Provides: latex-xcolor" in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 865231-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#865231: texlive-latex-recommended: no longer Provides latex-xcolor, making reverse dependencies uninstallable
- From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:12:35 +0200
- Message-id: <a8c79e53-5f46-d0a9-96bf-90aece9c3565@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <20170620050601.5q5hdq46seqmeboe@bulldog.preining.info>
- References: <878tkncqna.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <20170620030644.wgks2omfepkeeura@bulldog.preining.info> <87tw3bba2p.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <20170620050601.5q5hdq46seqmeboe@bulldog.preining.info>
On 20.06.2017 07:06, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi, >> quite a few packages in unstable and experimental which build-depend on > > Thanks, I actually searched with apt-cache rdepends and did expect > that something shows up, but it didn't. The grep-dctrl is the better tool. > > I have submitted bugs to the packages. > Meanwhile all of these bugs (except #865240) are closed and archived. So I guess our one can be closed too. Hilmar -- #206401 http://counter.li.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---