[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427009: marked as done (texlive-latex-base: a4wide doesn't work w/o a4.sty which is in texlive-latex-recommended)



Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:12:31 +0900
with message-id <[🔎] 20170725011231.db6ozyzpoortep7v@bulldog.preining.info>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #427009,
regarding texlive-latex-base: a4wide doesn't work w/o a4.sty which is in texlive-latex-recommended
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
427009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1
Severity: normal

The following document preamble:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{a4wide}

results in the error
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ltxmisc/a4wide.sty
Package: a4wide 1994/08/30


! LaTeX Error: File `a4.sty' not found.

Investigation shows that the file a4.sty is in
texlive-latex-recommended.
Please either move about a4wide and a4 so that they belong together,
or introduce appropriate dependencies into the packages.

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
a4wide is now in tl-latex-extra which depends on tl-latex-recommended,
closing this bug.

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc.     +    JAIST     +    TeX Live     +    Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

--- End Message ---

Reply to: