[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The hated xmltex/jadetex games in combination with new tex-common



Damned ....

On Son, 06 Aug 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > The jadetex/xmltex people could do:
> > - use etex as engine instead of latex
> > - load latex.ltx/.ini in their .ini file instead.
> > 
> > This would be a solution, or?
> 
> Yes, this would be good (that is, add the line \input latex.ltx to
> jadetex.ini etc.).

No, it is not. Damned. I tried.

First of all, loading latex.ini of latex.ltx without anything is bad, as
a \dump is hidden there ...

Second, if I do a
	\let\savedump\dump
	\let\dump\relax
	\input latex.ini
	\let\dump\savedump
	....
at the beginning of jadetex.ini it still breaks:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tipa/t3enc.def)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/cyrillic/t2aenc.def

! LaTeX Error: Encoding scheme `' unknown.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type  H <return>  for immediate help.
 ...                                              
                                                  
l.39 ...titution{\LastDeclaredEncoding}{cmr}{m}{n}
                                                  
? 


while with the &latex jadetex.ini (original version):
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tipa/t3enc.def)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/cyrillic/t2aenc.def)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def))
...

Grrrr... so we are out again. What now? Any ideas?

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUALL (vb.)
To speak with the voice of one who requires another to do something
for them.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



Reply to: