[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#338689: tex-common tells me /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg changed



Hi,

> > Package: tex-common
> > Version: 0.10
> >
> > tex-common seems to ask for verification on 
> > file change.
> > I suppose it's meant to be fixed in 0.10, but it's apparently not.
> 
> It seems as if you (or some script?) has changed the setting for
> dvipsDownloadBase14; this setting is also false in sarge and etch, but
> it doesn't show up in the diff.

This has happened on more than one machine, and I don't remember 
changing that configuration.

> > Inst tetex-extra [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) []
> > Inst libkpathsea4 (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) []
> > Remv tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx tetex-bin pgf ]
> > Inst tetex-bin [2.0.2-31] (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx pgf texinfo ]
> > Inst tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [texinfo ]
> > Inst tex-common (0.10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable)
> 
> I don't know where these lines are from, and how to interpret them.
> Does that mean that you just installed tetex-base before trying the
> upgrade?  Where there conffiles of tetex-base on the system before that? 
> 

It means, I installed tetex-bin, which pulled in tetex-base.
This is an output of single apt session.

The versions in the square brackets are the version numbers
before install. The versions in round brackets are the 
versions that are going to install.


tetex-extra 2.0.2c-9 -> 3.0-10
tetex-base 2.0.2c-9 -> remove -> 3.0-10
tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 -> 3.0-10.1
tex-common: Newly installed: 0.10


regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project



Reply to: