Bug#336714: tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:02:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >>
> >> - This system was a woody system somewhen (or testing/unstable with
> >> packages as later released with woody), with the texdocrc file
> >> belonging to the texdoctk package
> > [snip]
> >
> > It was never a woody system exactly. It was installed with testing or
> > unstable in January 2005, before sarge's release.
>
> And you never upgraded to one of the teTeX-2.9/3.0 versions in
> experimental?
No.
> No, it doesn't - if you installed testing or unstable in 2005 (or even
> in 2004), texdoctk was already gone by then, and dpkg wouldn't know any
> owner of the texdocrc file. I have no clue what is going on.
FWIW this occurred in my amd64 installation, but my i386 chroot didn't
have this issue. It was installed within a few weeks of the amd64.
However I probably have not done any (or as much) purging in the chroot.
(My i386 chroot did have the same problem with 00updmap.cfg btw.)
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: