Bug#332114: marked as done (tetex-bin depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:40 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 878xwstsl3.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:46:56 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Oct 04 16:46:56 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMwUq-0005fk-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:46:56 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id A541E17F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:56 +0000 (GMT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20051004234656.A541E17F72@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:56 +0000 (GMT)
From: joey@kitenet.net (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-bin
This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0
Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.
This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332114-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 09:12:46 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Mon Oct 17 02:12:46 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.127.101]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERR2z-0003z2-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:12:46 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9H9Cga3017468;
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:42 +0200
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ERR2v-0003lP-Ui; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:42 +0200
To: 333732-done@bugs.debian.org, 332840-done@bugs.debian.org,
332397-done@bugs.debian.org, 332301-done@bugs.debian.org,
332114-done@bugs.debian.org, 330278-done@bugs.debian.org,
327129-done@bugs.debian.org, 325551-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1ERQPu-0000dv-00@spohr.debian.org> (
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:32:22
-0700")
References: <[🔎] E1ERQPu-0000dv-00@spohr.debian.org>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:40 +0200
Message-ID: <[🔎] 878xwstsl3.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 332114-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Version: 3.0-8
Frank K=FCster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> tag 325551 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 327129 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 330278 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 332114 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 332301 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 332397 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 332840 + fixed-in-experimental
> tag 333732 + fixed-in-experimental
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to an
> upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows.
Couldn't someone fix the upload queue scripts?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Reply to: