Bug#195920: missing linker flags for texk/xdvik/ on GNU/FreeBSD
On 30.03.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
> > On 07.07.03 Robert Millan (zeratul2@wanadoo.es) wrote:
Hi,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/195920
> >
> [...]
> >> If you or anyone wants to help, i could give an account in my
> >> public GNU/FreeBSD box. See
> >> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/gnu-freebsd/pub/ACCESS
> >>
> > Well, I don't understand too much about the whole story. It wouldn't
> > be very helpful.
>
> Robert, you might also find http://people.debian.org/~frank/
> interesting. The tetex packages there are not intended to be used -
> I haven't done any function testing yet. But they do compile well
> on Linux/i386, and it would be interesting if you could try to
> build them on freebsd. Not very important, but it might be that if
> the bug is still there, it has been fixed upstream.
>
While we're on the way: Is #201935 eventually fixed, cause teTeX-beta
has switched to the standard way of using libtool? Or perhaps the
described way of updating libtool works now....
Well, I don't know so much about the Debian infrastructure, but
aren't there some build servers, you can upload packages to and tell
them to build that package just to test if everything is OK?
> I have commented out the lines in debian/rules where we used to
> copy updated config.{guess,sub} files into the build tree, because
> I don't know which is newer - this is one obvious place where one
> could look for errors.
>
In the files itself should be written, from which version of
autotools they were copied.
H.
P.S.: It's nonsense to send me the same E-Mail (same Msg-Id) 2 times,
as one of them will be killed on the POP-server.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: