Bug#121821: marked as done (tetex-extra: Updates to listings)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:08:00 -0500
with message-id <E16Acu8-0000hg-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#121821: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20011128-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2001 07:40:18 +0000
>From lars@segv.dk Fri Nov 30 01:40:18 2001
Return-path: <lars@segv.dk>
Received: from fepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.143]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 169iHS-00081s-00; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 01:40:18 -0600
Received: from tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk ([80.63.213.246])
by fepA.post.tele.dk
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with ESMTP
id <20011130074016.MQOL23247.fepA.post.tele.dk@tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk>
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:40:16 +0100
Received: by tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6E9C76C08; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:40:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Lars Munch <lars@segv.dk>
Subject: tetex-extra: Updates to listings
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <20011130074015.6E9C76C08@tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:40:15 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20000804a-2
Severity: wishlist
There exists som rather great and important updates to listings. Could they
please be included.
Thanks
-- Lars Munch
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux tuxedo 2.4.14 #3 SMP Wed Nov 14 15:55:33 CET 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.18 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20001218 teTeX binary files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 121821-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2001 20:08:02 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Dec 02 14:08:02 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16AcuA-0006Kv-00; Sun, 02 Dec 2001 14:08:02 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Acu8-0000hg-00; Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:08:00 -0500
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: 121821-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.66 $
Subject: Bug#121821: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20011128-1
Message-Id: <E16Acu8-0000hg-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:08:00 -0500
Delivered-To: 121821-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128.orig.tar.gz
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 121821@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:51:51 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-base tetex-doc tetex-extra
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20011128-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 46774 79420 109456 111366 111489 121821
Changes:
tetex-base (1.0.2+20011128-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream release. This release includes:
- the non-free cmbright fonts + macros were removed
- pb-diagram; added a Conflicts + Provides + Replaces on
the pb-diagram package.
- LaTeX 2001/06/01 (closes: #111366, #111489)
- updated semhelv package (closes: #46774)
- updated babel (closes: #79420)
- updated listings package (closes: #121821)
- marvosym works now as expected (closes: #109456)
* Removed latin9.def and latin10.def (reopens: #119531)
Files:
0e7c92a3aae5fe13d1b43c236db0e263 781 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.dsc
546bc8159ed290d6bcbb22ede2502252 37175777 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128.orig.tar.gz
05a4f469754fa2fbcc9448142d81d8a0 25926 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1.diff.gz
043e42e68b0a1082a4447f1fe057be69 11526618 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
1067b0e61780ec0f06b0124d85d3b829 10469346 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
00055ddcb500bf61f89be94835f9403c 15140640 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20011128-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD4DBQE8CWGNmfzqmE8StAARAqKKAJdolVk0KddJ9BluWV71EbTvw+S4AJ9CdJnP
H2xcXeYPaEoyY+8WpoqD3w==
=NXNo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: