Bug#172338: marked as done (ne2k-pci.o: Module not found (and unresolved symbols))
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100
with message-id <20031111012129.GC24495@uio.no>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2002 11:55:39 +0000
>From mlang@lexx.delysid.org Mon Dec 09 05:55:38 2002
Return-path: <mlang@lexx.delysid.org>
Received: from (lexx.delysid.org) [80.109.223.66] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18LMVe-00080G-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 05:55:38 -0600
Received: from mlang by lexx.delysid.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18LMVW-0004Rt-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:55:30 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Install report
From: Mario Lang <mlang@delysid.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:55:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87r8crpft9.fsf@lexx.delysid.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Mario Lang <mlang@lexx.delysid.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/local-di-sarge.iso, downloaded
today (8th december).
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:23:00 EST 2002 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.90GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Dec 9 12:33:48 CET 2002
Method: CDROM install.
Machine: Some standard PC here at tu-graz, see lspci and uname -a
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: /dev/hda1 (I only created one partition)
Root Size/partition table: Only one partition, 18GB.
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8753 [P4X266 AGP] (rev 01)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266 AGP]
00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: Unknown device deaf:9050 (rev 47)
00:08.1 Serial controller: Unknown device deaf:9051 (rev 47)
00:08.2 Class ff00: Unknown device deaf:9052 (rev 47)
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8029(AS)
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
ethdetect correctly detects the ne2k-pci module
for the NIC. But when doing modprobe ne2k-pci,
modprobe failed with "can't load module".
Investigating showed that insmod ./ne2k-pci.o
produces a lot of unresolved symbols.
Loading isa-pnp.o and 8390.o with insmod by hand
fixes unresolved symbols in ne2k-pci, and made
it loadable. But ethdetect still was not
able to load the module using modprobe, I had to
load it in the shell by hand.
Same effect on the installed system, I had to insmod isa-pnp.o and 8390.o
to get network working.
dhcp networking failed with the following error message:
installer[2084]: /sbin/pump: error while loading shared libraries: libpopt.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
So I had to configure the network using static IP.
One thing which was strange is that after the installation
(in the installed system) ifup appeared to use
dhcp. It did not use the IP I configured in d-i.
---
I installed using brltty! yes, I did! It only
partly worked (had to do:
3 (shell)
mknod /dev/tty0 c 4 0
brltty -b ts -d /dev/tts/0
(will fix this in the next brltty-udeb upload).
base-installer still doesn't handle brltty
installation in the target system, but that was obvious
from the start since I didnt implement that yet.
Besides the problem with the NIC, great work! I actually
installed sarge!
--
CYa,
Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
| Get my public key via finger mlang@db.debian.org
| 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 01:21:33 +0000
>From root@sesse.net Mon Nov 10 19:21:32 2003
Return-path: <root@sesse.net>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJNDm-00049B-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:21:30 -0600
Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJNDl-0006Ne-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: 172338-done@bugs.debian.org, 172405-done@bugs.debian.org,
179428-done@bugs.debian.org, 186283-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing old installation reports
Message-ID: <20031111012129.GC24495@uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.23-pre9 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 172338-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_90
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
(Resending this with randomized addresses in the To: field; it might have
been eaten by SpamAssassin. Apologies if it reaches BTW twice :-) )
I'm closing a bunch of old installation reports that do not appear to be
related to the current state of the installer (ie. report problems that has
been fixed now; some of these should have been closed ages ago, but never
was). Feel free to test the d-i beta and submit new installation reports :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: