Re: [RFC PATCH 0/13] sparc32: sunset sun4m and sun4d
- To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
- Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>, Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>, Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, gentoo-sparc@lists.gentoo.org, info@temlib.org
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/13] sparc32: sunset sun4m and sun4d
- From: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:07:08 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 605c6679-3bb8-d056-f961-d4bf3f4f386a@yahoo.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] d7c8c97e-6aab-3d11-c8a5-2a08fe872647@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20201218184347.2180772-1-sam@ravnborg.org> <[🔎] 20201219214054.GB3132151@ravnborg.org> <[🔎] d7c8c97e-6aab-3d11-c8a5-2a08fe872647@physik.fu-berlin.de>
I also have a couple of SPARCstation 5 systems that I'd like to be able
to keep using.
-Stan Johnson
On 12/19/20 2:57 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/19/20 10:40 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> Please keep the inputs coming independent if you are pro or not
>> for the sunset of sun4m and sun4d.
> I would personally be in favor of keeping it and I should finally get
> my SPARCstation 5 up and running again.
>
> Adrian
>
Reply to: