Re: using sarge on production machines

To: harry@uklug.co.uk
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: using sarge on production machines
From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-security@zugschlus.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:33:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050218113319.GE24763@torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050218102517.57200.qmail@web50405.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <[🔎] 20050218021435.2b60bc1e@macia> <[🔎] 20050218102517.57200.qmail@web50405.mail.yahoo.com>

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:25:17AM -0800, Harry wrote:
> use UML and chroot it and run sarge in it.

What does this gain you? A compomised uml is as bad as a compromised
system.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using sarge on production machines
  - From: Harry <postituk@yahoo.com>

References:
- using sarge on production machines
  - From: kurt kuene <kurtkuene@gmx.net>
- Re: using sarge on production machines
  - From: Harry <postituk@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Please help test Snort 2.3.0 (experimental) packages
Next by Date: Re: using sarge on production machines
Previous by thread: Re: using sarge on production machines
Next by thread: Re: using sarge on production machines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread