Re: PGP vs. GPG && BAD SIGNATURE
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <palfrader@writeme.com> writes:
Peter> Hi Pollywog!
>> mutt thinks: > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30
>> 03:33:11 2000) --] > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24
>> 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC > gpg: BAD signature from
>> "Ethan R. Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>" > [-- End of PGP output
>> --]
Peter> Argl. I really should read more than BAD sig.
Peter> Pollywog, you really should not include signatures of other
Peter> mails in replies :)
but that mail was PGP/MIME formatted. So I don't think it is quite as simple
as what you are saying.
This was Ethan's signature:
--MSd2ShuMixI0uVaZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjkLe5QACgkQJKx7GixEevxO0QCeOBfj3MY+n6NIO8Qt/AA8tBSu
cm4An3ggPcIQ1KXmNTxrDRlhw1ZdFXuE
=GaGX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MSd2ShuMixI0uVaZ--
this is Pollywog's signature (the reply to that last message):
--_=XFMail.1.4.4.Linux:20000430005809:27687=_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjkLe5QACgkQJKx7GixEevxO0QCeOBfj3MY+n6NIO8Qt/AA8tBSu
cm4An3ggPcIQ1KXmNTxrDRlhw1ZdFXuE
=GaGX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--_=XFMail.1.4.4.Linux:20000430005809:27687=_--
oh wait, yes they are the same. Why XFMail is doing this, I don't know
(as I don't use it myself). Perhaps this is a bug in XFMail.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: