Re: [Fwd: Bug#921214: ed2k-hash: Incorrect hashes on amd64]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Team,
I fixed this bug and added autopkgtests to the package.
Please review and upload.
Cheers,
Sven
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2019, 13:24 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer:
> Hello Team,
>
> just want to let you know I am working on this.
>
> Cheers,
> Sven
>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Von: Josef Vitu <josef@vitu.org>
> Antwort an: Josef Vitu <josef@vitu.org>, 921214@bugs.debian.org
> An: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Betreff: Bug#921214: ed2k-hash: Incorrect hashes on amd64
> Datum: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 09:21:29 +0100
>
> > Package: ed2k-hash
> > Version: 0.4.0+ds-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch upstream
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > the hashes computed by ed2k-hash version 0.4.0+ds-1 differ from the
> > ones computed by other software
> > (such as RHash) and also some older versions of the same package.
> > This issue is exactly the same
> > as in #562833 and the same patch fixes it:
> >
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-p2p/ed2k_hash/files/ed2k_64bit.patch?rev=1.1&view=log
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: buster/sid
> > APT prefers testing
> > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
> > 'testing-debug'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1,
> > 'experimental')
> > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> > Foreign Architectures: i386
> >
> > Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> > Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
> > LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> >
> > Versions of packages ed2k-hash depends on:
> > ii libc6 2.28-5
> >
> > ed2k-hash recommends no packages.
> >
> > ed2k-hash suggests no packages.
> >
> > -- debconf-show failed
> >
> >
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=i2SX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: