[SECURITY] [DSA 4395-2] chromium regression update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4395-2 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert
February 26, 2019 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : chromium
Debian Bug : 922794 923298
A regression was introduced in the previous chromium security update. The
browser would always crash when launched in headless mode. This update fixes
this problem.
A file conflict with the buster chromium packages is also fixed.
For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 72.0.3626.96-1~deb9u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your chromium packages.
For the detailed security status of chromium please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/chromium
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=EtLw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: