Re: State of shiny-server packaging
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 20:49:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:25:41PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> >> > personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the
> >> > ITP/RFPs. I think the latter will be automagically turned into RFPs so
> >> > there is not really any work needed.
> >> please take ownership of the ITP/RFP bugs.
> >
> >From my point of view its sufficient if those bugs stay as they are and
> > someone who is informed about the status (for instance due to this
> > thread) that anybody is kindly invited to close that ITP. I do not feel
> > my time productively spent in maintaining these bug metadata and just
> > grab another RC bug meanwhile.
>
> Uh, I'm confused. Taking ownership of the ITP is what you said you'd do if I want
> (see just some lines above).
Yes: "I think the latter will be automagically turned into RFPs so there
is not really any work needed." I think in this *special* case this
ownership is not really important. If you enjoy fiddling around with
those metadata just feel free. The sentence before what I quoted now
was rather "mentally" than "technically" - sorry for confusion.
> Anyway, shiny-server-client[1] is ready for upload
> (modulo compat and standards bumps).
OK, and probably also change of Uploader if I understood you correctly?
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-shiny-server-client
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: