[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: rails: bookworm-pu: ruby-activerecord vs ruby-arel [was: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?]



On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:49:23PM +0000, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Dear team,
> 
> Any comments on the mail below?
> 
> Thanks,
> Georg
> 
> On 23-07-29 13:00:20, Georg Faerber wrote:
> > Dear team,
> > 
> > I recently uploaded rails 2:6.1.7.3+dfsg-2 to unstable [1] with the
> > following change:
> > 
> >   * debian/control:
> >     - Declare that ruby-activerecord breaks and replaces ruby-arel:
> >       it was merged five years ago, is therefore obsolete and to be
> >       removed. (Closes: #1038935)
> > 
> > Please see the bug for details.
> > 
> > I intend to do a bookworm-pu with the same change, to get ruby-arel
> > removed afterwards.
> > 
> > Is this fine with you? Do you see any potential problems?

IMO you should just go ahead with this.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: