Hi Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > I wrote update-ruby-alternatives, and the solution I came up with was to > > add it to a new package called ruby-common, which the actualy > > interpreter packages (ruby1.8, ruby1.9.1 etc) should depend on. > > > > The code for this is ready in the `update-ruby-alternatives` branch on > > the ruby-defaults git repository, would you have a look at it and tell > > us what you think? Do you guys agree with that implementation? > > Hi Antonio, > > I reviewed the ruby-common package, and it sounds very good to me. The > only comment is that it should probably be a separate ruby-common source > package (ruby-defaults contains only transitional packages at this > point). > > Another option would be to call it "ruby-switcher" or "ruby-switch". > What do you think? I think these are very sensible suggestions, thank you. I've worked on this today and we have a first version of the ruby-switch package: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-switch.git;a=summary Feedback is welcome. I will probably upload it sometime during next weekend. I also thought better and figured out that making the interpreter packages depend on it is too much, so I think ruby-switch is going to be a regular, optional package. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature