Your message dated Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:04:03 +0100 with message-id <b8381576-b6db-30ea-ef6e-5b88cf4e5b13@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1027866: reportbug should not cc: debian-boot@ on section (only) override requests against ftp.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1027866, regarding reportbug should not cc: debian-boot@ on section (only) override requests against ftp.debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1027866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: reportbug should not cc: debian-boot@ on section (only) override requests against ftp.debian.org
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:41:56 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] Y7VJ5MCofTWu2kmx@layer-acht.org>
Package: reportbug Version: 7.10.3+deb11u1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, so I filed a bug against ftp.debian.org to change the section of the vrms binary package and wondered about the x-debbugs-cc: debian-boot@ being set, so I asked on #debian-ftp : < h01ger> .oO( why oh why does reportbug add a x-debbugs-cc: debian-boot@ here? ) < ansgar> | h01ger: The Cc: d-boot@ is for priority changes as d-boot@ is interested in those. I don't think it should Cc them if only the section changes. < h01ger> ansgar: ah, ic. so i dropped that cc: rightfully when submitting #1027818 < zwiebelbot> (#debian-ftp) Debian#1027818: override: vrms:oldlibs/optional - < pabs> h01ger: could you reportbug reportbug about the no-cc-debian-boot-on-section-changes thing? < pabs> and maybe xcc debian-boot on that bug :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ These heat waves aren’t tragedies, they’re crimes. The fossil fuel industry knew decades ago that this is what their pollution was causing, so they spent billions to lie to the public and block climate action.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org>, 1027866-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1027866: reportbug should not cc: debian-boot@ on section (only) override requests against ftp.debian.org
- From: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@mailbox.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:04:03 +0100
- Message-id: <b8381576-b6db-30ea-ef6e-5b88cf4e5b13@mailbox.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Y7VJ5MCofTWu2kmx@layer-acht.org>
- References: <[🔎] Y7VJ5MCofTWu2kmx@layer-acht.org>
Version: 7.9.0 On 04.01.2023 10.41, Holger Levsen wrote: > > so I filed a bug against ftp.debian.org to change the section of the vrms binary > package and wondered about the x-debbugs-cc: debian-boot@ being set, so I asked > on #debian-ftp : > > < h01ger> .oO( why oh why does reportbug add a x-debbugs-cc: debian-boot@ here? ) > < ansgar> | h01ger: The Cc: d-boot@ is for priority changes as d-boot@ is > interested in those. I don't think it should Cc them if only the > section changes. This was fixed in November 2020 in commit a951d0129f4f4e6649aa455c992722c00e87715a
--- End Message ---