Bug#1059535: transition: abseil
- To: Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org>, 1059535@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1059535: transition: abseil
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:57:10 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZgqvJrPYhfYxhE28@ramacher.at>
- Reply-to: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, 1059535@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87h6gowwwx.jfx@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name>
- References: <170370094466.2104958.16740261741993534909.reportbug@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name> <874jeau8ri.jfx@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name> <170370094466.2104958.16740261741993534909.reportbug@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name> <Zc0cJKcvmjkjYLbi@ramacher.at> <ZgatzpFtzjbrs6Ia@ramacher.at> <170370094466.2104958.16740261741993534909.reportbug@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name> <87h6gowwwx.jfx@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name> <170370094466.2104958.16740261741993534909.reportbug@dymaxion.benjamin.barenblat.name>
On 2024-03-29 17:27:58 -0400, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> On Friday, March 29, 2024, at 1:02 PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Since the version in unstable fails to build on armel and armhf and
> > blocks the time_t transition, but the version in experimental builds
> > fine, let's do this transition now.
> >
> > With the upload to unstable, please check the FTBFS issue on risc64,
> > though.
>
> Sounds good. I never did get around to uploading 20240116 to
> experimental. I’ll upload 20230802 to unstable this weekend, and I’ll
> come back for 20240116 later.
Thanks! Could you please re-add the build dependency on dpkg-dev (>=
1.22.5) to ensure that the build with the new armel/armhf ABI only
migrates when the time_t transition is ready to advance?
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: