Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:58:37PM -0500, Mo Zhou wrote:
>
> On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared
> > library or not?
> flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among the list
> links against it statically.
Not related specifically to this transition, but this likely means that
the same issue as #1031716 exists, dependencies on python3-flatbuffers
are not strict enough to ensure matching the version of flatbuffers-compiler?
cu
Adrian
Reply to: