Bug#1030839: marked as done (pyatem needs hinting into testing)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:51:31 +0200
with message-id <CAM8zJQsEMowpNmvB7sTb3-RNSzLkbjbWsZhnwBfAFRwtJin_AQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1030839: pyatem needs hinting into testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030839,
regarding pyatem needs hinting into testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1030839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Migration status for pyatem (- to 0.8.2-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ openswitcher/arm64 has unsatisfiable dependency
∙ ∙ openswitcher-proxy/arm64 has unsatisfiable dependency
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for pyatem/0.8.2-1: amd64: Pass, armel: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻
The package currently builds only on x86 and mips* (and some ports architectures),
which makes:
- the binary-all package not installable on arm64, and
- autopkgtest FAIL badpkg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 09:54, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> wrote:
> The package currently builds only on x86 and mips* (and some ports architectures),
> which makes:
> - the binary-all package not installable on arm64, and
> - autopkgtest FAIL badpkg
hint added
--- End Message ---
Reply to: