On 2022-09-22 10:07, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-09-19 13:28:21 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> On 2022-09-19 12:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> > On 2022-09-19 11:54:36 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> > > This transition can be considered done, if we're happy with the
>> > > state of
>> > > rheolef reported by
>> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html
>> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rheolef
>> >
>> > It's only done when the old mumps libraries are removed from testing.
>> > That's currently blocked by getfem and rheolef:
>> ...
>> > The both need to be fixed or removed from testing.
>>
>> I see it, thanks for the clarification.
>
> What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package
> renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished.
Hi Sebastian, Konstantinos Poulios was preparing the getfem package. I
uploaded on his behalf.
Kon, getfem has some bugs preventing it from migrating to testing (the
forthcoming new stable release), and tests are failing on i386 and
ppc64el. We're trying to rebuild in order to finalise a recent upgrade
of mumps to v5.5.1. The tracker page for getfem is
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/getfem
Can you see what updates the getfem package needs?
Drew
[changing mail address to avoid the gmail spam filter]