[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1017043: marked as done (transition: openexr)



Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:26:27 +0200
with message-id <Yw2tk9/8saWubmmy@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1017043: transition: openexr
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017043,
regarding transition: openexr
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1017043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017043
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I'd like to request a transition slot for openexr 3.x transition.
Basically this is an API change as well as a merge of ilmbase into
openexr (previously two packages).

openexr 3.1.5 is available in experimental:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openexr&suite=experimental

I've build all reverse dependencies without major issues. Package
openexr-viewers will need to be RM since abandonned upstream.

openvdb current status may interfere a bit in the process.

Thanks

Ben file:

title = "openexr";
is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libopenexr25|openexr\-doc)\b/ | .depends ~ /\b(libopenexr\-3\-1\-30|libopenexr\-doc)\b/;
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libopenexr\-3\-1\-30|libopenexr\-doc)\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libopenexr25|openexr\-doc)\b/;

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-08-17 12:18:02 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-08-15 13:47:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openexr.html
> > 
> > On 2022-08-12 11:19:43, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > > 
> > > I'd like to request a transition slot for openexr 3.x transition.
> > > Basically this is an API change as well as a merge of ilmbase into
> > > openexr (previously two packages).
> > > 
> > > openexr 3.1.5 is available in experimental:
> > > 
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openexr&suite=experimental
> > > 
> > > I've build all reverse dependencies without major issues. Package
> > > openexr-viewers will need to be RM since abandonned upstream.
> > > 
> > > openvdb current status may interfere a bit in the process.
> > 
> > openvdb is not in testing, so that won't be an issue.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> >From some build failures (e.g. [1]), it looks like the -dev packages is
> missing a dependency on zlib1g-dev. Please add the dependency.

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: