Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Reverse-Build-Depends
* blender [irrelevant; ftpfs, no matching function for call to openvdb... ] #1011653
* bowtie [ok]
* bowtie2 [ok]
* casparcg-server [ftbfs, TBB not found during cmake] #1011654
* deal.ii [ftbfs, cmake could not find tbb] #1011655
* embree [ok]
* flexbar [ftbfs, cannot find tbb header] #1011656
* gazebo [irrelevant; ftbfs, missing symbol from libtiff] #1011657
* gudhi [ok]
* libatomic-queue [ok]
* libpmemobj-cpp [ftbfs, tbb api break] #1011658
* macaulay2 [unknown, timeout for doc build during ThreadedGB ... Minimal.out]
* madness [ok]
* mathicgb [ok]
* mpqc3 [irrelevant; eigen3 api break; already FTBFS]
* numba [irrelevant; incompatible with py3.10]
* onednn [ok]
* open3d [ok]
* opencascade [ftbfs; tbb api break] #1011659
* opencv [ok]
* opensubdiv [ftbfs; tbb api break] #1011660
* openturns [ok]
* openvdb [irrelevant; help2man error during manpage build; already FTBFS]
* pmemkv [ok]
* ptl [ok]
* r-cran-markovchain [ftbfs; tbb api break] #1011661
* r-cran-rcppparallel [ok]
* r-cran-uwot [ok]
* salmon [ftbfs; tbb api break] #1011662
* slic3r-prusa [FTBFS, TBB api break] #1011663
* sysdig [ok]
* tiledarray [irrelevant: other build depenency uninstallable]
* tiny-dnn [ftbfs, TBB not found during cmake] #1011664
* trilinos [irrelevant: isinf not defined]
* vtk9 [ok]
On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 22:28 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/onetbb.html
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-03-13 16:59:48 -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi release team,
>
> This involves an upstream source name change (from tbb to onetbb),
> as well as SOVERSION bump (from 2 to 12), along with a major API
> change including some changes in the core API.
>
> I should have submitted this after my local build test for the
> reverse dependencies of libtbb-dev, but fellow developers from
> debian-science are eager to see this in unstable to unblock
> their works.
>
> I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux
> developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And
> some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as
> a result. I guess we can take similar measures for short
> term workaround.
Please remove the moreinfo tag once these issues have been
investigated
and bugs have been filed.
Cheers
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "tbb";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libtbb2" | .depends ~ "libtbb12";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libtbb12";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libtbb2";
> Thank you for using reportbug
>
Reply to: