Your message dated Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:36:56 +0200 with message-id <YTh2KET5um4OmZBc@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#992970: transition: wbxml2 has caused the Debian Bug report #992970, regarding transition: wbxml2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 992970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: wbxml2
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:27:03 -0400
- Message-id: <c1c100009d901b785fb79edbb8bcafaa16fb5c8a.camel@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org tille@debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wbxml2.html Dear Release Team, I am looking into starting the transition as shown on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wbxml2.html . The transition is caused by upstream's SONAME bump in the new release. For package wbxml2, the only reverse dependency is virtuoso-opensource. I have tested that the build for virtuoso-opensource is ok with wbxml2 from experimental. Example Ben file (the one currently from auto-wbxml2 should be enough): title = "wbxml2"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-0" | .depends ~ "libwbxml2-1"; is_good = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-1"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-0"; Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>, 992970-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#992970: transition: wbxml2
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:36:56 +0200
- Message-id: <YTh2KET5um4OmZBc@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] YS868QRdwMFOps3u@ramacher.at>
- References: <c1c100009d901b785fb79edbb8bcafaa16fb5c8a.camel@debian.org> <c1c100009d901b785fb79edbb8bcafaa16fb5c8a.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] YS868QRdwMFOps3u@ramacher.at>
On 2021-09-01 10:33:53 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 993431 993390 > > On 2021-08-25 14:27:03 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org tille@debian.org > > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wbxml2.html > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > I am looking into starting the transition as shown on > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wbxml2.html . The transition > > is caused by upstream's SONAME bump in the new release. > > > > For package wbxml2, the only reverse dependency is virtuoso-opensource. I have > > tested that the build for virtuoso-opensource is ok with wbxml2 from > > experimental. > > Unfortunately virtuoso-opensource now silently drops support for the > wbxml2 plugin. It also FTBFS on non-amd64 architectures. I've removed virtuoso-opensource from testing, so that one is "done". Cheers > > Cheers > > > > > Example Ben file (the one currently from auto-wbxml2 should be enough): > > > > title = "wbxml2"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-0" | .depends ~ "libwbxml2-1"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-1"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libwbxml2-0"; > > > > > > Thanks, > > Boyuan Yang > > > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---