[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#972393: transition: armadillo



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for
all reverse dependencies. Please let me know your opinion.

Thanks.

Kumar

Ben file:

title = "armadillo";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-- 
Kumar Appaiah


Reply to: