[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#971349: nmu: colord,gimagereader,haskell-bindings-sane,hplip,libimage-sane-perl,libinsane,libkf5sane,libreoffice,pike8.0,pillow-sane,sane-airscan,sane-frontends,scanbd,simple-scan,wine,xsane



Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On 2020-09-29 08:36:46 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hello,
> 
> please rebuild the following packages to use the new lib after rename libsane to
> libsane1.
>  
> 
> nmu colord_1.4.4-2  . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu gimagereader_3.3.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu hplip_3.20.5+dfsg0-3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu haskell-bindings-sane_0.0.1-13 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu libimage-sane-perl_5-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu libinsane_1.0.7-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu libkf5sane_20.08.0-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu wine_5.0-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu pike8.0_8.0.702-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu pillow-sane_2.8.3-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu libreoffice_1:7.0.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu sane-frontends_1.0.14-16 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu scanbd_1.5.1-6 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu simple-scan_3.36.4-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> nmu xsane_0.999-9 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'

I'm not really sure what you're trying to achieve here. You've asked
for a transition slot (#960046) but completely ignored the moreinfo tag
and then went ahead anways. In any case, for a proper transition we
would have tracked binNMUs in that bug report instead of a new one.

I think that this effectively reopens #908681 which I will unarchive and
reopen.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: