[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#971024: marked as done (transition: botan)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Oct 2020 09:51:23 +0200
with message-id <20201002075123.GA16570@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#971024: transition: botan
has caused the Debian Bug report #971024,
regarding transition: botan
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
971024: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi RMs,

I would like to update Botan from libbotan-2-13 to libbotan-2-15 in Sid.
Bit complex situation. Transition tracker shows biboumi as the only
reverse dependency. I didn't try to build it with the new Botan as it
fails to build with GCC 10 anyway. For this, an RC bug already exists
and the package was removed from testing some time ago. Last
maintainer upload was over two years ago.
But Thunderbird also affected, if only the version in experimental.
Build tested it with the new Botan version. Builds correctly, but I
doubt you will binNMU it there.

Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-09-26 14:56:40, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On 2020-09-26 14:50:06 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hi RMs,
> > 
> > I would like to update Botan from libbotan-2-13 to libbotan-2-15 in Sid.
> > Bit complex situation. Transition tracker shows biboumi as the only
> > reverse dependency. I didn't try to build it with the new Botan as it
> > fails to build with GCC 10 anyway. For this, an RC bug already exists
> > and the package was removed from testing some time ago. Last
> > maintainer upload was over two years ago.
> 
> Please go ahead.

botan      | 2.15.0+dfsg-2  | testing                 | source

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: