Bug#866389: transition: perl 5.26
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:50:16AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/07/17 19:04, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:01:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:39:09 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>
> >>> We need to distinguish among blockers and non-blockers in that list. E.g.,
> >>> "fails to run with perl 5.26" is a blocker, but "uses a deprecated feature" is
> >>> not.
> >>
> >> Just for clarification, most of the bugs which have "deprecated" in
> >> the title will fail to run with 5.26; IOW: the warnings are from
> >> 5.24, and in 5.26 the issues become fatal.
> >
> > I've retitled those bugs would could be confusing in this regard. I
> > believe that all the bugs which severity: important are the ones which
> > would become RC when we decide we want to start soon.
> >
> > Noting for completeness that Niko has added the other lockers on
> > architecture: all related FTBFS bugs as requested by Emilio.
>
> Thanks. Please go ahead and bump them to severity:serious as we are close to
> doing this.
Thanks, done.
--
Niko
Reply to: