[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#861723: marked as done (unblock: poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5)



Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2017 21:08:00 +0000
with message-id <4331f6f1-58f3-702c-586f-5364a2cd3f21@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#861723: unblock: poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #861723,
regarding unblock: poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
861723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861723
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package poco

I only added missing dependencies to fix the RC bug #861682.

Thanks!

debdiff attached.

unblock poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf, arm64

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
diff -Nru poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/changelog poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2016-11-07 08:41:36.000000000 +0100
+++ poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2017-05-02 22:00:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+poco (1.7.6+dfsg1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add missing dependencies (Closes: #861682)
+
+ -- Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org>  Tue, 02 May 2017 22:00:07 +0200
+
 poco (1.7.6+dfsg1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Fix unit tests (Closes: #843225)
diff -Nru poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/control poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/control
--- poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/control	2016-11-02 08:23:30.000000000 +0100
+++ poco-1.7.6+dfsg1/debian/control	2017-05-02 21:58:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 Package: libpoco-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libpococrypto46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodata46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocofoundation46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodatamysql46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocomongodb46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpoconet46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpoconetssl46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodataodbc46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodatasqlite46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocoutil46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocoxml46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocozip46 (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libpococrypto46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodata46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocofoundation46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodatamysql46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocomongodb46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpoconet46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpoconetssl46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodataodbc46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocodatasqlite46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocoutil46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocoxml46 (= ${binary:Version}), libpocozip46 (= ${binary:Version}), libexpat1-dev, default-libmysqlclient-dev, libpcre3-dev, libsqlite3-dev, libssl-dev, zlib1g-dev
 Description: C++ Portable Components (POCO) Development files
  The POCO C++ Libraries are a collection of open source C++ class libraries
  that simplify and accelerate the development of network-centric, portable

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jochen Sprickerhof:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package poco
> 
> I only added missing dependencies to fix the RC bug #861682.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> debdiff attached.
> 
> unblock poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5
> 
> [...]

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: